I must admit, as a recent owner of Research in Motion, I am a little biased in saying that the recent sell-off in the stock is overblown. Down from over $60 per share in March of 2011, to the high $20's, on the announcement of slower growth and late product development is more than a bit much. Of course, there are many bears in the proverbial Wall Street woods that claim Research in Motion is about to go the way of Palm and other early device makers, but this is not just another dog stock with terrible fleas.
The usual story for defunct technology companies is that they begin to burn cash quicker than they can make it. To be sure, many even have to borrow hordes of cash from investors and banks just to stay current with new developments and recent trends. RIM does not fit this bill. It has over $2 billion of cash in the bank, and it earned almost $700 million in the last quarter alone! To be sure, growth is slowing... but that does not mean everyone should just abandon ship and find the nearest lifeboat. They are at the end of a product cycle and it will take some time for them to release and market their new QNX operating system products, like those similar to the Playbook.
The other reason, which is clearly starting to gain traction, is that investors are starting to really smell a takeover target. When this happens, a floor starts to be created in the price of a stock. According to the CBC, potential "suitors mentioned in the past have included the likes of Microsoft, Oracle, Cisco, IBM and Hewlett-Packard." Each of these companies has deep pockets that could gobble up and enjoy RIM for breakfast. In addition, there are many great technology companies that would love to seize all of RIM's technology in one fell swoop. Why spend billions inventing your own systems when RIM's could be had for much less... plus you get the cash in their bank account remember. Most estimate the cost of buying all of RIM at around $20 billion. This is a large number, but not that large for the technology giants of the world's stock markets.
Happy Investing and be sure to give RIM a look in the near future.
Here is some additional information on this story:
http://www.cbc.ca/news/business/story/2011/06/17/f-rim-shares-buy.html
Showing posts with label NYSE: IBM. Show all posts
Showing posts with label NYSE: IBM. Show all posts
Thursday, June 23, 2011
Research in Motion (TSE: RIM) Decline Way Overblown. Should You Buy RIM Before it is Taken-Over?
Thursday, March 3, 2011
Investors Should Buy What They Know and Steer Clear of What They do not Understand.
It is important for the intelligent investor to "buy what they know." Or only stick to owning businesses for which they would be able to notice opportunities, changes, or threats in their respective sectors. When competing with millions of other people around the world for the buying and selling of stocks, one must possess a reasonable expectation of spotting competitive, strategic, or systemic threats to the businesses that they own. It is, therefore, important to diversify, but only within reason.
For instance, many investors have an appetite and desire to own technology and renewable energy stocks. On the whole, the rapid and inherent nature of change in the technology sector makes threats and difficulties very difficult to notice with regards to many technology stocks on the market today. Many great technology names have come and gone over the years, and few have managed to withstand the constant pressure to innovate and re-invest themselves.
IBM (NYSE: IBM) has done so for decades, and continues to do so with much success, but many others are in constant fear of being overtaken by the next great technological fad or change. Even the great Microsoft (Nasdaq: MSFT) is beginning to come under siege by Google (NYSE: Goog), Apple (Nasdaq: AAPL) and others... especially in the cloud computing arena, which might be the next great shift in the technology space.
Other individuals might be very astute at spotting key developments in the fashion or retail space. Personally, many clothing stocks such as Aeropostale (NYSE: ARO), American Eagle (NYSE: AEO), Gap (NYSE: GPS) etc. carry a lot of uncertainty as I may be unaware of important trends taking place in the fashion space. On the other hand, trends in the energy, banking, or consumer staples arena are much easier for me to wrap my head around. A knowledge of current oil inventories and reserves for Suncor (TSE: SU), in combination with a prediction of energy prices over the next year, could give me a reasonable valuation for the company, but a variety of key factors concerning current clothing trends would leave me at a disadvantage compared to other investors in this sector of the economy. In the Art of War, Sun Tsu said to evade your enemy if unequally matched. In investing, the same is true.
Warren Buffet, the Oracle of Omaha and guru for many value investors, always said to steer clear of something that you do not understand. It is nearly impossible to tell if a company has a "durable competitive advantage," or good defence against competition, if you do not understand how its business operates, who its primary competitors are, and what threats or changes are on the horizon. Without this knowledge, the intelligent investor is exposing themselves to far too much risk. Investing should never be a guessing game, but a calculated and well played match between you and other investors to acquire businesses for a reasonable and well rationalized price.
If you cannot assign a true dollar value to the company, independent of the current stock price, than you should not own it. You would not buy a rental property without first understanding the neighbourhood it is in and how much rent it generates, so do not buy a stock without first knowing how it actually makes its money, who its customers are, and what the competition is like.
If most industries are unfamiliar to you, a quality, low-fee mutual fund or exchange traded fund are probably best.
Happy Investing : )
For instance, many investors have an appetite and desire to own technology and renewable energy stocks. On the whole, the rapid and inherent nature of change in the technology sector makes threats and difficulties very difficult to notice with regards to many technology stocks on the market today. Many great technology names have come and gone over the years, and few have managed to withstand the constant pressure to innovate and re-invest themselves.
IBM (NYSE: IBM) has done so for decades, and continues to do so with much success, but many others are in constant fear of being overtaken by the next great technological fad or change. Even the great Microsoft (Nasdaq: MSFT) is beginning to come under siege by Google (NYSE: Goog), Apple (Nasdaq: AAPL) and others... especially in the cloud computing arena, which might be the next great shift in the technology space.
Other individuals might be very astute at spotting key developments in the fashion or retail space. Personally, many clothing stocks such as Aeropostale (NYSE: ARO), American Eagle (NYSE: AEO), Gap (NYSE: GPS) etc. carry a lot of uncertainty as I may be unaware of important trends taking place in the fashion space. On the other hand, trends in the energy, banking, or consumer staples arena are much easier for me to wrap my head around. A knowledge of current oil inventories and reserves for Suncor (TSE: SU), in combination with a prediction of energy prices over the next year, could give me a reasonable valuation for the company, but a variety of key factors concerning current clothing trends would leave me at a disadvantage compared to other investors in this sector of the economy. In the Art of War, Sun Tsu said to evade your enemy if unequally matched. In investing, the same is true.
Warren Buffet, the Oracle of Omaha and guru for many value investors, always said to steer clear of something that you do not understand. It is nearly impossible to tell if a company has a "durable competitive advantage," or good defence against competition, if you do not understand how its business operates, who its primary competitors are, and what threats or changes are on the horizon. Without this knowledge, the intelligent investor is exposing themselves to far too much risk. Investing should never be a guessing game, but a calculated and well played match between you and other investors to acquire businesses for a reasonable and well rationalized price.
If you cannot assign a true dollar value to the company, independent of the current stock price, than you should not own it. You would not buy a rental property without first understanding the neighbourhood it is in and how much rent it generates, so do not buy a stock without first knowing how it actually makes its money, who its customers are, and what the competition is like.
If most industries are unfamiliar to you, a quality, low-fee mutual fund or exchange traded fund are probably best.
Happy Investing : )
Labels:
Aeropostale,
American Eagle,
Apple,
cloud computing,
Gap,
Google,
IBM,
Microsoft,
Nasdaq: AAPL,
Nasdaq: MSFT,
NYSE: AEO,
NYSE: ARO,
NYSE: GOOG,
NYSE: GPS,
NYSE: IBM,
Suncor,
technology,
TSE: SU
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
